Conflicts between shareholders can destroy in months what took years to build. Since 2006, we have intervened quickly and discreetly to protect the interests of each party and, above all, to keep the business alive — regardless of the human context.
From drafting articles of association to managing the most tense exclusion or dissolution proceedings, we have the legal tools and practical experience for any corporate scenario.
A minority shareholder (30%) systematically blocked GMS decisions, paralysing the company's activity, generating significant monthly losses and preventing any major strategic decision.
Judicial exclusion obtained. The company regained its decision-making capacity; activity returned to normal within 60 days, without further damage.
A shareholder requested withdrawal from the company and claimed a valuation of his shares artificially inflated through a subjective expert report, endangering the company's liquidity.
Legal counter-expertise obtained. The withdrawal value was set correctly, saving the client over EUR 120,000 compared to the shareholder's initial claims.
Two founders with different visions on exit and dividends were about to form a long-term partnership without a shareholders' agreement to govern crisis scenarios.
A complete Shareholders' Agreement drafted: deadlock, drag-along, tag-along and pre-emption clauses. The partnership operated without judicial conflicts throughout the collaboration.
Discuss your case with Att. Laura Nicoara — confidential and commitment-free.