From 462,840 to 748,771 compensation points, for a demolished building comprising seven apartments and the related land.
In a dispute concerning the compensation awarded for a property unlawfully taken by the State, we challenged the decision by which the National Commission for Real Estate Compensation (CNCI) had set the award at 462,840 points.
Following the action we filed, the Tribunal partially annulled the compensation decision and ordered the CNCI to issue a new decision for 748,771 points.
The compensation established by the court is higher by 285,931 points — an increase of approximately 61.8% over the initial valuation.
The compensation file concerned a demolished residential building comprising seven apartments and the related land, with a surface area of over 400 sqm.
Under the contested decision, the CNCI had awarded 462,840 points. In our view, that value did not correctly reflect the technical characteristics of the property or the values set out in the public notaries' price guide applicable to the valuation.
Under Law no. 165/2013, the valuation of properties that can no longer be restituted in kind is expressed in points and is carried out by reference to the relevant notarial price guide, taking into account the technical characteristics and the situation of the property at the date it was taken. Under the law, one compensation point has a nominal value of one leu.
We challenged the number of points awarded and requested a separate assessment of the value of the seven apartments and of the related land.
The analysis covered:
The Tribunal upheld the action brought against the CNCI and ordered:
Difference obtained: 285,931 points · an increase of approximately 61.8%
The case shows that a compensation decision issued by the CNCI should not be accepted automatically where the valuation does not correctly reflect the expropriated property or the applicable notarial price guide.
Reviewing the documents, the surface areas and the calculation method can lead to a substantial difference between the compensation granted administratively and the one established by the court.
We review the number of points, the notarial price guide applied, the surface areas assessed and the characteristics of the property, in order to establish whether the decision can be challenged.
The judgment presented was delivered at first instance and is subject to the appeal provided by law. Details that could lead to the identification of the client have been removed or generalised. The result does not guarantee a similar outcome in other disputes.